Jenifer Fewswick's $58,000 tax lien is yet another reason not to elect the DCC's hired gun as our Elections officer.Fenswick was unavailable to comment on this issue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
DNN - The Single Source of News Supporting Liberty in Del Norte.
Do you feel the U.S. A.'s economic future is
Posts
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(23)
-
▼
May
(9)
- DNN -Stop finger-pointing on the Klamath Basin
- DNN: Comment and Response
- DNN: Fenswick Tax Lien
- DNN - CORRUPTION: Guest Editorial by Ron Plechety
- DNN - OLD News that should be re read.
- DNN: More Samples of Really Trippy Tricks
- DNN - Trippy Tricks: a prediction
- Del Norte News: Archie
- Del Norte News: More is Less
-
▼
May
(9)
1 comment:
Common Sense
Recently a small clutch of documents has come across my desk; the contents of which, when considered in the light of this local campaign season, cannot go un-addressed. If facts presented in these documents are taken into serious consideration by the voting public of this county they will pose some very serious questions on the ethics, competence and reliability of one candidate for the office of County Clerk - Recorder.
On August fourth of 2004 a present candidate for local office wrote to Mr. Rick Holley, then personnel director of the Del Norte County Unified School District, and later on August ninth to Ms. Donna Walsh, an employee of the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors, requesting "a copy of all records including job applications, transfer applications, sick leave records, disability and retirement applications, performance evaluations and disciplinary determinations and any other confidential documents pertaining to the employment of …."
The above incident was not the only time this person attempted such. More recently in a similar action, she sought to obtain highly personal and private documentation on an employee at Pelican Bay State Prison. A person known to be active in local politics. Again, to no avail. This second action is as equally well documented.
In both cases and to their credit Mr. Holley, Ms. Walsh and the prison officials declined to provide this information to the requestor. To do so would have obviously crossed the line on personal protections and have been a serious violation of personal privacy rights. However, the consideration of the legality or illegality of these actions is not my concern here. These issues can best be served, through future deliberations, by those better grounded in the law than I.
The issue to be considered at this point by you and I is the fitness of this candidate to hold a public office of trust in our community.
Toward this consideration the facts noted above raise three serious questions on this candidate's aspirations for the office of County Clerk - Recorder:
1. Why? Why would she need the personal and private records of a particular public servant and a particular employee at a penal institution? If not to, with biased malice and partisan forethought, realize an unethical intent to assassinate the character and harm the standing of two citizens in our community.
2. How could someone, aspiring to a public office in our community be so colossally ignorant of fundamental public law?
3. Can any of us truthfully vote someone to County Clerk - Recorder who has demonstrated questionable ethics, colossal incompetence and an unabashed disregard for the honesty, un-biasness and nonpartisanship required of this position?
For myself this answer is self evident, yet yours to make at the polls. Please share and discuss this with your friends and be sure to vote, because your choice will dictate the kind of administration we'll all have to live with.
Post a Comment